popular searches
The Concordat to Support Research Integrity
Upcoming Webinar Series
Publications
Annual Conference
Research Ethics Support and Review
Our People
Code of Practice for Research
Checklist for Researchers
Checklist during COVID-19
Case Study Packs
Researcher Checklist of Ethics Applications
Concordat Self-Assessment Tool
https://ukrio.org/wp-content/themes/ukrio/assets/img
This note contains information and advice about student interaction with research integrity and engaging with them about it.
Guidance
Managing research misconduct investigations can be challenging. This document contains tips and ideas to help the process run more smoothly.
An accessible version of UKRIO's Procedure for the Investigation of Misconduct in Research.
Designed as a template which can be adopted by research organisations or used to inform the development of their own processes, the Procedure is a step-by-step manual for investigating misconduct in research, applicable to all subject areas and suitable for all organisations engaged in research – universities, NHS organisations, private sector bodies and charities.
This guide, alongside our short guide to misconduct investigations, will support you in reporting suspected research misconduct and questionable research practices (QRPs) to institutions, publishers, and elsewhere, and to let you know what to expect from the process.
An FAQ that addresses the themes of many questions that were raise by the attendees of this webinar.
This document aims to share best practice from academic and research organisations that have implemented a model of Research Integrity Champions, Leads and/or Advisers.
Accessible version of the Code of Practice for Research is an essential reference tool to support researchers and research organisations in the conduct of research of the highest quality and standards.
The recruitment of research misconduct panel members can be difficult and time consuming. This document contains suggestions on how to go about it.
Peer review excerpt from UKRIO's Code of Practice for Research.
This document focuses on responsible conduct, good governance and ethical oversight of animal use in research.
What is a Research Ethics Committee? Research ethics committees (RECs) are an important part of a healthy research culture. Their role is to consider the ethical implications of research. Read more..
A PDF of a presentation summarising the key points of the guidance in PowerPoint
A presentation summarising the key points of the guidance in PowerPoint
This document is a summary version of Research Ethics Support and Review in Research Organisations
This document offers benchmark policies and processes which organisations can use to create or revise institutional practices in order to support the functions of research ethics committees
This document aims to assist in RECs developing their knowledge around internet-mediated research, embedding relevant principles and considerations and embedding this guidance into research culture to assist in ethical review, research practice and consideration of ethical issues.
This guide aims to give useful information on allegations of research misconduct and research misconduct procedures, for anyone who has made an allegation or is considering doing so, who is subject to an allegation, or who is relatively new to research misconduct such as early-career researchers, journalists, or the public.
The Code of Practice for Research is an essential reference tool to support researchers and research organisations in the conduct of research of the highest quality and standards.
This guide aims to provide introductory information on the Concordat to Support Research Integrity to those not familiar with it. It should be of use to researchers, research integrity officers and those who are considering raising concerns relating to research integrity with a research organisation.
Model research misconduct procedure 2023 - summary of responses and change made following a survey on the draft procedure in May 2022.
This article considers Questionable Research Practices as a spectrum of behaviours, ranging from honest errors and mistakes at one end, through to more serious behaviours at the other.
In collaboration with COPE this guidance is intended to raise awareness of the proper criteria for retractions.
This guidance documents explores good authorship practices.