Devised by the UK Government, Universities UK and major funding agencies, The Concordat to Support Research Integrity sets out five commitments that those engaged in research should make to help ensure that the highest standards of rigour and integrity are maintained. These key commitments apply to researchers, their employers and funding bodies alike. The major funders of research and universities in the UK now require compliance with the Concordat as a condition of their grants.
UKRIO has developed a Self-Assessment Tool to help institutions identify areas of their research practices, policies, researcher development and monitoring that may need revision in order to comply with the Concordat. It also goes further than helping with compliance, allowing institutions to consider how they might carry out a broad implementation of the Concordat, building on their existing activities.
Download your copy here:
Our Self-Assessment Tool poses self-assessment questions for institutions, each mapped onto one or more commitments of the Concordat. For each question, this document also introduces practical ways in which they might be met under the heading ‘possible evidence’. An annex discusses what might be included in an annual institutional statement on research integrity, a key recommendation of the Concordat.
Guidance is given on every aspect of the Concordat but particular attention has been paid to areas where UKRIO has most often been approached for guidance, in the hope of passing on lessons learned to the research community. Use of the self-assessment questions will not only help with the implementation of the Concordat, but also enhance an institution’s overall approach to research integrity and help ensure that important issues have not been overlooked.
Feedback on our Self-Assessment Tool for the Concordat
Our Self-Assessment Tool has been used by UKRIO subscribers since 2014.
Universities UK’s 2016 progress report on the Concordat praised the help provided by our Self-Assessment Tool and other resources:
‘…the most oft-cited resources that institutional leads on research integrity drew on were those provided by the UK Research Integrity Office, with both the ‘hard’ guidance available through UKRIO (such as model policies and processes) and the ‘soft’ support (such as informal advice and the annual conference) being highly valued.’
A university representative commented in the report:
“The Concordat, the [UKRIO] Code of Practice for Research and the [UKRIO] Self-Assessment Tool […] have, together, provided a comprehensive set of tools with which to understand and promote research integrity within the institution.”